When engaged in a conversation in which the charr is the expert on a given topic, certain shrewd and some everywheret interactions take place. According to a turn over by Leet-Pellegrini when two wo hands are diametrical to lether and unitary is the expert, the second takes a supportive role in the conversation. However, when women were the experts and men were not as well informed, (some were given information precedent to the conversation to aid them in knowing more rough the subject of violence and television), men usually joc spoted for position over the char, challenging her expertise and being less supportive. Although seen by Leet as indifference to the woman, the author, Deborah Tannen, thought it could be a sign of shared respect because the man was treating the expert woman the same port that men treated the expert men in their paired conversations. The point being that men always sought-after(a) what she be as respect whether paired with another man or with a woman. I know of a study for conjoin couples that determined that men would kinda live unloved than disrespected. I think that respect is the controlling point of the conversation, not gender, counterbalance though there was occasion where it seemed demeaning to the man that the woman knew more, that too still could have been respect related rather than simply gender.
In Aries?s study with the mannish groups and female groups that were seeking camaraderie, the males did so by determining a pecking order, or hierarchy based on knowledge of the subject. The women sought camaraderie by establishing a network of intimate connections. The key to a hierarchy for women, if it can be said there was one was who was most interconnected in the group. Relationship was the publicize for the female groups. In working in different...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper