Scott v. Sandford (1857) Scott v. Sandford (1857) Dred Scott was held as a slave to second resident Dr. tin can Emerson. In1834 Scott traveled with Dr. Emerson to the state of Illinois, and in 1836 to areas of present day manganese only to finally return back to Missouri in 1838. Slavery was forbidden in the state of Illinois and under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was also forbidden in the traveled areas of Minnesota. Upon the remainder of his owner, Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that since slavery was outlawed in the free territories he had temporarily resided in, he had become a free man there.
While an initial public opinion by a lower state court declared him free, this ruling was later overturned by the Missouri Supreme court of law eventually leading the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Before apostrophizeing whether Scott was fitting to be deemed free or not, the first dispute to address arose over if a slave even had the standing/ levelheaded right to sue in a feder...If you want to reward a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper