        Tannen and Ploetz have two different views on custody and wo custodys dialogue patterns. Tannen takes an a governmental stance and believes men news spread abroad talk and women sonorousness talkÂ. Ploetz believes men take a more political stance and use dominant speech acts, like com humannessds, orders, challenges, and criticism. tour women defend, ask for favors, beg, request permission, and ask someone elses perspective on the situationÂ. In my opinion I think men and women have the power to communicate on an equal level. workforce just tend to take a more scrappy approach. (Tannen pg. 9, Ploetz pg. 68)         Tannen believes men and women were raised in two different cultures. She believes that in that respect is a male culture where men moderate to blab out like men and a female culture where you learn to speak like a womanÂ. Ploetz thinks men and women end understand and communicate on the same level kinda well. I totally agree, if we were in the late 1950s when things were a caboodle different I could relate. Now in 2001 woman and men have equal opportunity and the same status, yes the table relieve turns toward the men, but women have come a long delegacy and gained much respect. (Tannen pg. 9)         Ploetz says, men tend to dominate in their conversationsÂ, term Tannen says men express ignorance, selfishness, and rudenessÂ.
I dont think Tannen is correct. Yes, when men speak its more of a status symbol, usually the man doing all the talking is running the show but I dont think that shows any signs of being ignorant, selfish, or rude. (Ploetz pg. 69,73) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Tannen believes men report and are interested in a different goal, the outcome of problemsÂ. I think Tannen is correct, men do tend to report but thats because men and woman are not miscommunicating they just...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment